Contact Us
Questions, comments, ideas for future content? Contact us below.
Show me someone who thinks ChatGPT writes great persuasive copy and I’ll show you someone who got a C in high school English.
I debated jumping on the ChatGPT hot take bandwagon. But I have yet to see The Correct Take. It’s Friday so F it, here we go.
There will be actionable, useful takeaway for recruiters at the end. Stick with me…
I’ve played around with this thing since launch. What most people, especially ChatGPT Prompt Guru hucksters (former experts in Clubhouse, web 3.0, and crypto), get completely backwards:
👉It’s terrible at creative things. It’s great at boring things.
Ad copy. Sales emails. Blog posts. Tweets. Slogans.
ChatGPT sucks at these. If you disagree, see my opening line.
It’s a robot. It writes like a robot. Always.
The Prompt Gurus will say something like “You have to train it, give it similar writing samples, tell it what persona it should be, specify tone, regenerate the response 10 times, then you’ll have a starting point.”
Sure. Or you could save a bunch of time by writing it yourself.
Why? No matter what instructions you give it, ChatGPT writes like a robot attempting to imitate a human. It’s incapable of writing a banger.
2 things it is GREAT at. Examples in recruiter terms:
1. Research & Preparation.
👉When recruiting a skill set you’ve NEVER worked on before, give it the job description. Ask it:
👉When sourcing, ask it:
2. Boring Writing and Proofreading.
ChatGPT writes terrible job ads. But passage job descriptions.
Tip: It works better on single sentences or phrases than a full body of text. Fixing awkward phrasing, suggesting synonyms in a specific context, switching passive voice to active voice.
Partner at Hirewell. #3 Ranked Sarcastic Commenter on LinkedIn.
Executive search isn’t some mysterious dark art. You’re not paying for secret handshakes and a magic Rolodex.
But that’s exactly what legacy firms want you to think.
They sell prestige. They sell access. They sell fear. And some companies buy it—because no one wants to screw up a high-profile hire.
Here’s the truth: access is the easy part. Executives respond more than anyone. The real challenge? Fit. Immersion. Results after the hire. And most firms skip that part entirely.
Jeff Smith and James Hornick rip the curtain off the smoke-and-mirrors world of exec search—and explain why most firms are failing their clients (badly) in The 10 Minute Talent Rant, Episode 109, “What Everyone Gets Wrong About Executive Search.”
Episode 109