Contact Us
Questions, comments, ideas for future content? Contact us below.
Anyone remember how LinkedIn started? Like way, way back in the day?
To contact someone – anyone – a mutual connection needed to introduce you. Thus the whole “linked” part of the name.
Like all social networks, it promised community. Better networking. An opportunity to make the world a little smaller.
But you don’t hit sales targets by waiting for permission. Thanks for the worldwide “if you don’t join it, you’re weird” company directory. Now we know who to email directly…
And just like that, the original idea died. InMails and DMs were born out of necessity to stay relevant.
Once you open Pandora’s box, there’s no going back. It’s been a slow decline ever since. For normal, everyday users, LinkedIn is a transactional platform.
(I say “normal” users because “weirdo” users like myself i.e. dorks who post content, it’s a different animal with different issues entirely.)
People go there when they need it. Not because they try to proactively network. The spam drove them away.
(Side note: this is the main reason why people are responding to years-old InMails. They’re finally logging back in, just now.)
Spam may be unfair. There’s lots of recruiters (and salespeople) using it for thoughtful outreach.
But we’re inundated. Plus the automation bots (which are supposed to be illegal but never seem to go away) make it too easy.
Even if you’re “doing it right” it’s a slog. But that doesn’t mean it’s total trash either.
Contact less people. Put more time into your message. So everyone still here knows you’re not a bot or spray-and-praying.
👉Recruiters: Details, details, details. Job seekers expect far more from you up front than they used to.
Even then, they may still flake out on you (reply, but not follow through.) But that’s the reality now.
👉Salespeople: Stop it with the Force Familiarity as a way of finding faux-common ground.
Yes I went to Penn State. No, I don’t give a crap about the football schedule. You’re the 90th person to mention it.
Don’t treat LinkedIn like it’s mass email. You’re contributing to the problem.
👉More importantly: it’s not going to work for you.
Full episode of The 10 Minute Talent Rant “Decoding Candidate Behavior in 2023” here.
Partner at Hirewell. #3 Ranked Sarcastic Commenter on LinkedIn.
If you’re hiring in 2026, you’re dealing with two realities at the same time.
First, traditional signals like degrees and pedigree are losing their value.
Second, Gen Z is reshaping expectations around speed, transparency, and trust.
Together, those forces are pushing talent acquisition into its next evolution.
As we outlined in Agentic HR Is Here: What Talent Acquisition Really Looks Like in 2026, recruiting is becoming more autonomous at the execution level. But autonomy alone doesn’t solve the core hiring problem.
You still need a better way to evaluate people.
That’s where skills-first hiring comes in.
For decades, degrees were used as a shortcut.
Not because they reliably predicted success, but because they reduced perceived risk and simplified decision-making.
That logic no longer holds.
Roles are changing too fast. Job titles mean less than they used to. And in a market where AI can generate a polished resume in seconds, pedigree is an even weaker signal.
Companies need capability, not credentials.
The bigger shift isn’t just skills-based hiring. It’s skills intelligence.
Instead of organizing work around static job descriptions, companies are starting to think in terms of capabilities. Work is assigned based on skill, not hierarchy or tenure.
This is the same evolution happening across workforce planning more broadly. Not headcount planning, but capability planning.
And it’s the only model that holds up in a fast-moving market.
Skills-first hiring is gaining traction because it solves multiple problems at once.
It improves quality of hire.
It increases internal mobility.
It reduces bias tied to pedigree.
And it aligns better with how work actually gets done.
But it’s also accelerating for a more practical reason.
The resume is no longer reliable.
As we covered in The AI-on-AI Hiring Arms Race, recruiting teams are now dealing with a flood of highly optimized, AI-generated applications. Many look great on paper and collapse under real scrutiny.
When that happens, skills-based evaluation stops being a “nice to have.” It becomes the only way to restore signal.
Now layer in Gen Z.
By 2026, Gen Z is one of the fastest-growing segments of the workforce. They are also the least tolerant of slow, opaque hiring processes.
One of the most important data points in the market right now is this:
A majority of Gen Z candidates will drop out if a hiring process exceeds 22 days.
Speed, to them, isn’t about impatience. It’s about competence.
If a company can’t run a clear, efficient hiring process, candidates assume it can’t run the business well either.
It’s a trust issue.
A large percentage of job seekers report that looking for work negatively impacts their mental health. The biggest driver isn’t rejection.
It’s silence.
Waiting to hear back. No closure. No clarity on next steps.
For Gen Z, that lack of transparency is a dealbreaker. It signals misalignment, not just poor communication.
In 2026, how you hire is inseparable from how you’re perceived as an employer.
For Gen Z, the hiring experience is part of the offer.
They expect:
If the process feels like a black box, they assume the culture is the same.
This is where skills-first hiring and agentic systems intersect. Technology can speed up execution, but only leadership can ensure the experience remains human.
The companies adapting fastest in 2026 are focused on a few fundamentals:
Skills-first hiring isn’t just about fairness. It’s about accuracy.
And Gen Z isn’t asking for special treatment. They’re forcing employers to modernize a hiring process that’s been broken for a long time.
The companies that adapt will hire better, faster, and with less churn. The companies that don’t will keep blaming the market while losing candidates to competitors who simply run a better process.
Most companies agree with skills-first hiring in theory. Very few have operationalized it in a way that actually improves outcomes. If you want help redesigning your hiring process for 2026, especially around skills-based evaluation and candidate experience, we can help. Reach out and we’ll walk you through what’s working right now.