Contact Us
Questions, comments, ideas for future content? Contact us below.
About that remote work piece
The Internet: where nuance goes to die. As is the case with remote work discussions.
A week ago, I wrote about the real trade-offs between remote and office work (then followed it up with a 10 Minute Talent Rant episode with Jeff Smith). Itโs just a different world than it was in 2020.
Our takes ruffled some feathers. Because in the hive mind of Angry LinkedIn, there is no trade-off: youโre either pro-remote because itโs perfect for everyone in every wayโฆ or youโre a corporate ghoul.
Mind you, I wrote that piece and recorded our podcast in the same place Iโm writing from now: my basement. In my house. Remotely.
A few things stood out:
๐ People only digest topics through their own lens.
“Youโre wrong because this doesnโt apply to me!”
I never said it did, dum dum.
I donโt believe in a one-size-fits-all approach to any policy. And frankly, I donโt think I should have to state that out loud. Itโs implied that the 8 billion people on Earth are all different.
When discussing any topicโwork policies, economics, leadership styles, whateverโthereโs always nuance and individual variation.
But if you canโt detach from a self-centered worldview, everything feels like a personal attack.
๐ Socialization in business is different from socialization in your personal life.
One of the biggest gaps in remote work (notice I didnโt say โreasons why everyone should work in an officeโ) is the lack of social development.
The biggest challenge in modern work, by a mile, is getting people to work together effectively. Full stop. This is another Hill Iโll Die Onโข๏ธ.
Hanging out with friends and family isnโt the same. You can hang up the phone. You can leave the party. You can ghost people. Conflict avoidance strategies are endless.
But you canโt do that at work. You have to collaborate with people (who are often more different from you than your friends and family), work through problems, andโmost importantlyโhave difficult conversations. While still getting the job done.
The irony? The people losing their minds in LinkedIn comment sections are exactly the ones this applies to most. (Maybe thatโs Alanis Morissette irony. Can I get a judgeโs ruling?)
๐ We can all look at our own lives and see the inconsistencies.
In 2013, my year was mediocre as hell. Probably the first time my results went backward.
My solution? Work from home two days a week.
And it worked. In 2014, my productivity and billing numbers skyrocketed. I started a new division at Hirewell (our marketing recruiting practice). Then, after a couple of years of talking to marketing execs all day, I asked, โWhy are we doing all this?โ and started our internal marketing function. Then I focused on selling more. Then I started creating content.
Next thing you know, Iโm a Chief Growth Officer.
All because I decided two days of remote work would help me grind harder, focus more, and get more done.
The catch? No way in hell I could have done that in my 20s. (Again, talking about me here. Not everyone.) Back then, I hadnโt developed the business socialization skills, the time management skills, or the focus needed to stay on task.
I, myself, am proof that someone can both thrive and struggle in a remote setting, depending on the stage of their career.
Because nothing in life is one-size-fits-all.
You can check out the full discussion Jeff and I had on The 10 Minute Talent Rant, ep 106, โThe Price of Staying Homeโ here.
Partner at Hirewell. #3 Ranked Sarcastic Commenter on LinkedIn.
Over the last year, hiring teams have started seeing a wave of new job titles pop up across tech, sales, and operations.
Some are legitimate new roles.
Others are existing jobs with a slightly different name.
And many of them have one thing in common: AI is suddenly part of the job description.
From Go-to-Market Engineers to AI Specialists, companies are experimenting with new roles as they figure out how automation and AI fit into their teams.
But most of these positions arenโt entirely new. Theyโre evolutions of existing roles.
One role that is gaining traction is the Go-to-Market Engineer.
Depending on who you ask, it is either:
In practice, it is a bit of both.
As Matt Tokarz recently pointed out after closing a search for an Outbound & Go-to-Market Specialist, the role looked very different from traditional RevOps. The focus was not reporting or CRM hygiene. It was building prompts, leveraging tools like Clay and Smartlead, and enabling SDRs and AEs with backend insights to accelerate pipeline growth.
Instead of traditional RevOps work like reporting and CRM management, the focus was on:
The goal was not simply managing sales data. It was accelerating pipeline generation through automation.
One trend is becoming clear. Companies are not replacing entire departments with AI.
Instead, they are changing how existing roles operate.
Sales teams still need pipeline.
Marketing teams still need content.
Engineering teams still need to build software.
The difference is that employers now expect candidates to use AI tools as part of their workflow.
As Zac Colip noted during the discussion, we are currently in a transitional phase where companies are labeling roles with โAIโ as they experiment with how the technology fits into teams.
But that may not last forever.
Right now, AI still feels new enough that companies highlight it in job titles.
But eventually, AI will likely become a baseline expectation, not a specialty.
Think about it like cloud technology or data analytics.
At first, companies hired โcloud specialists.โ Now most engineers are expected to understand cloud infrastructure.
The same shift will likely happen with AI.
Instead of hiring โAI-enabled marketersโ or โAI engineers,โ companies will simply expect employees to know how to work with AI tools.
One challenge with these emerging roles is simple: there arenโt many candidates with real experience yet.
Many of these positions didnโt exist two years ago.
In one recent search, we started looking for a candidate locally in Chicago. Eventually we expanded nationwide because the pool of people with relevant experience was extremely limited.
This is a common issue with emerging roles:
That gap will likely persist for the next few years.
Another noticeable shift is that roles are becoming more hybrid.
Instead of hiring for narrow responsibilities, companies are combining multiple functions into one position.
As Matt Mulcahy highlighted, one example is the rise of Forward Deployed Engineers, a model popularized by Palantir.
These engineers:
What used to involve several roles, including product managers, engineers, and solution architects, can now sometimes be handled by one person. AI development tools are part of what makes this possible.
Not every industry is moving at the same pace.
As Ashley DuBois pointed out, some sectors, such as transportation, are applying AI to specific workflows like load booking and operational automation.
At the same time, some companies are adding โAIโ to job titles even when the core responsibilities remain largely traditional.
In many cases, it is still essentially an IT manager role with AI familiarity layered in.
This reflects a broader transition period where companies want to signal modernization and candidates want to signal relevance.
In logistics, AI is increasingly handling scheduling, tracking, and coordination tasks.
According to Brittany Lasky, operational roles such as logistics coordinators may experience the greatest impact from automation.
However, freight brokers who manage negotiation and strategic RFPs remain in demand.
AI can optimize processes. It does not replace relationship management or strategic negotiation.
Across industries, a pattern is emerging.
Execution becomes automated. Strategy becomes more valuable.
Automation is also reshaping finance and accounting roles.
As Adam Slater noted, accounts receivable jobs that once focused on high-volume manual processing are evolving into more analytical positions centered on reporting and insights.
The work is not disappearing. The expectations are increasing.
Organizations are now hiring for:
Even roles traditionally considered administrative now require deeper technical capability.
AI is not eliminating analyst roles. It is expanding them.
Financial analysts are also expected to understand tooling, sourcing, and data transformation.
In many cases, two or three roles are being combined into one.
This raises a long-term question.
If entry-level roles become more complex or disappear entirely, how will organizations develop senior talent in the future?
The traditional model of high-volume cold calling is changing.
According to Jack Smith and Emily Canna, teams are shifting toward:
At the same time, companies are moving away from activity-based KPIs and focusing more on outcomes such as demos set and SQLs generated.
In a market saturated with automated outreach, authentic communication has become a competitive advantage.
Several clients have said it directly. They want a human in the seat.
Every six to twelve months, hiring trends in go-to-market teams shift.
As Jennifer Salerno noted, companies move through cycles.
One quarter it is BDRs.
Then RevOps.
Now it is go-to-market engineers.
Many companies experimented heavily with AI to accelerate pipeline generation.
What those experiments exposed were structural gaps, particularly in outbound strategy.
AI can support execution. It does not replace a well-built top-of-funnel engine.
Inbound momentum can hide weaknesses. Outbound forces clarity.
The companies gaining traction right now are not chasing trends. They are rebuilding the fundamentals of their go-to-market strategy.
For employers, the takeaway is straightforward. Job descriptions and expectations need to evolve alongside technology.
Across functions, we are seeing the same shift play out. AI is not eliminating entire roles. It is changing how those roles operate and increasing the baseline skill set required to perform them well.
Hiring managers should start thinking less about traditional titles and more about capabilities. That often means prioritizing candidates who can:
In many cases, the perfect candidate with the exact title simply does not exist yet. The strongest hires are often people who have developed adjacent skills and shown the ability to adapt as the tools evolve.
The broader trend is that AI is accelerating a shift that was already underway.
Roles are becoming more hybrid. Expectations are increasing across nearly every function. And repetitive tasks are being automated, leaving more strategic work behind.
Sales teams still need pipeline.
Operations teams still need coordination.
Finance teams still need reporting and analysis.
Engineering teams still need to build software.
What is changing is how the work gets done and what skills are required to do it well.
Right now we are in a transitional phase where companies are still labeling roles with โAIโ as they experiment with new workflows and technologies.
Over time, that label may disappear.
AI will simply become part of how work gets done.
And the roles themselves, while evolving, will look more familiar than the titles might suggest.