Contact Us
Questions, comments, ideas for future content? Contact us below.
They don’t need to be.
In June 2022, I wrote about how layoffs hit a record low that April. 2 years to the date. Going back to the year 2000.
(The numbers have since been adjusted and it’s the second lowest number of layoffs. Only Oct 2021 was lower.)
It was a little mind-bending because all the attention grabbing headlines of big tech companies doing wide scale layoffs had already started. Sure, it picked up further, but it was in full swing.
Looking more closely at the data, the last half of 2023 โ what we can hope was the absolute bottom โ still had less layoffs on a monthly basis than nearly every month of the 2010-2019 boom. The H2 2023 months were in the 1.5-1.6 million range, most of the 2010s were in the 1.7-1.8 million range. Go ahead and check the data here.
Now the tinfoil hat crowd will say โthe government is fudging the numbers!โ But the explanation much simpler: weโre in the LinkedIn bubble, then and now.
The core โsocialโ audience of LinkedIn โ recruiters, salespeople, and more broadly the tech-centric Office Dorkโข๏ธ community โ was in the cross hairs of it all. And thatโs not to diminish it. But it explains how a lot of us can be consumed with doom and gloom yet talk to our friends in other industries who have no idea what weโre talking about. Their sectors are booming and they canโt find enough people.
I donโt want to talk about layoffs anymore. Nor do I want to rag on the LinkedIn echo chamber.
๐The fact that the LinkedIn echo chamber exists points to how irrelevant the platform is to large parts of the business community.
Manufacturing, health care, academia, skilled trades, clinicians, government, etc. These are real jobs and make up enormous parts of our job economy. And the people in these industries tend to not give a crap about LinkedIn.
On one hand, you could say itโs a growth opportunity. But if 20 years in, it hasnโt happened, I donโt see why it would start now.
And if youโre not growing in tech, your days are numberedโฆ
Full episode of The 10 Minute Talent Rant, ep 85 โWill LinkedIn Be Dead In 10 Years?โ here.
Partner at Hirewell. #3 Ranked Sarcastic Commenter on LinkedIn.
Over the last year, hiring teams have started seeing a wave of new job titles pop up across tech, sales, and operations.
Some are legitimate new roles.
Others are existing jobs with a slightly different name.
And many of them have one thing in common: AI is suddenly part of the job description.
From Go-to-Market Engineers to AI Specialists, companies are experimenting with new roles as they figure out how automation and AI fit into their teams.
But most of these positions arenโt entirely new. Theyโre evolutions of existing roles.
One role that is gaining traction is the Go-to-Market Engineer.
Depending on who you ask, it is either:
In practice, it is a bit of both.
As Matt Tokarz recently pointed out after closing a search for an Outbound & Go-to-Market Specialist, the role looked very different from traditional RevOps. The focus was not reporting or CRM hygiene. It was building prompts, leveraging tools like Clay and Smartlead, and enabling SDRs and AEs with backend insights to accelerate pipeline growth.
Instead of traditional RevOps work like reporting and CRM management, the focus was on:
The goal was not simply managing sales data. It was accelerating pipeline generation through automation.
One trend is becoming clear. Companies are not replacing entire departments with AI.
Instead, they are changing how existing roles operate.
Sales teams still need pipeline.
Marketing teams still need content.
Engineering teams still need to build software.
The difference is that employers now expect candidates to use AI tools as part of their workflow.
As Zac Colip noted during the discussion, we are currently in a transitional phase where companies are labeling roles with โAIโ as they experiment with how the technology fits into teams.
But that may not last forever.
Right now, AI still feels new enough that companies highlight it in job titles.
But eventually, AI will likely become a baseline expectation, not a specialty.
Think about it like cloud technology or data analytics.
At first, companies hired โcloud specialists.โ Now most engineers are expected to understand cloud infrastructure.
The same shift will likely happen with AI.
Instead of hiring โAI-enabled marketersโ or โAI engineers,โ companies will simply expect employees to know how to work with AI tools.
One challenge with these emerging roles is simple: there arenโt many candidates with real experience yet.
Many of these positions didnโt exist two years ago.
In one recent search, we started looking for a candidate locally in Chicago. Eventually we expanded nationwide because the pool of people with relevant experience was extremely limited.
This is a common issue with emerging roles:
That gap will likely persist for the next few years.
Another noticeable shift is that roles are becoming more hybrid.
Instead of hiring for narrow responsibilities, companies are combining multiple functions into one position.
As Matt Mulcahy highlighted, one example is the rise of Forward Deployed Engineers, a model popularized by Palantir.
These engineers:
What used to involve several roles, including product managers, engineers, and solution architects, can now sometimes be handled by one person. AI development tools are part of what makes this possible.
Not every industry is moving at the same pace.
As Ashley DuBois pointed out, some sectors, such as transportation, are applying AI to specific workflows like load booking and operational automation.
At the same time, some companies are adding โAIโ to job titles even when the core responsibilities remain largely traditional.
In many cases, it is still essentially an IT manager role with AI familiarity layered in.
This reflects a broader transition period where companies want to signal modernization and candidates want to signal relevance.
In logistics, AI is increasingly handling scheduling, tracking, and coordination tasks.
According to Brittany Lasky, operational roles such as logistics coordinators may experience the greatest impact from automation.
However, freight brokers who manage negotiation and strategic RFPs remain in demand.
AI can optimize processes. It does not replace relationship management or strategic negotiation.
Across industries, a pattern is emerging.
Execution becomes automated. Strategy becomes more valuable.
Automation is also reshaping finance and accounting roles.
As Adam Slater noted, accounts receivable jobs that once focused on high-volume manual processing are evolving into more analytical positions centered on reporting and insights.
The work is not disappearing. The expectations are increasing.
Organizations are now hiring for:
Even roles traditionally considered administrative now require deeper technical capability.
AI is not eliminating analyst roles. It is expanding them.
Financial analysts are also expected to understand tooling, sourcing, and data transformation.
In many cases, two or three roles are being combined into one.
This raises a long-term question.
If entry-level roles become more complex or disappear entirely, how will organizations develop senior talent in the future?
The traditional model of high-volume cold calling is changing.
According to Jack Smith and Emily Canna, teams are shifting toward:
At the same time, companies are moving away from activity-based KPIs and focusing more on outcomes such as demos set and SQLs generated.
In a market saturated with automated outreach, authentic communication has become a competitive advantage.
Several clients have said it directly. They want a human in the seat.
Every six to twelve months, hiring trends in go-to-market teams shift.
As Jennifer Salerno noted, companies move through cycles.
One quarter it is BDRs.
Then RevOps.
Now it is go-to-market engineers.
Many companies experimented heavily with AI to accelerate pipeline generation.
What those experiments exposed were structural gaps, particularly in outbound strategy.
AI can support execution. It does not replace a well-built top-of-funnel engine.
Inbound momentum can hide weaknesses. Outbound forces clarity.
The companies gaining traction right now are not chasing trends. They are rebuilding the fundamentals of their go-to-market strategy.
For employers, the takeaway is straightforward. Job descriptions and expectations need to evolve alongside technology.
Across functions, we are seeing the same shift play out. AI is not eliminating entire roles. It is changing how those roles operate and increasing the baseline skill set required to perform them well.
Hiring managers should start thinking less about traditional titles and more about capabilities. That often means prioritizing candidates who can:
In many cases, the perfect candidate with the exact title simply does not exist yet. The strongest hires are often people who have developed adjacent skills and shown the ability to adapt as the tools evolve.
The broader trend is that AI is accelerating a shift that was already underway.
Roles are becoming more hybrid. Expectations are increasing across nearly every function. And repetitive tasks are being automated, leaving more strategic work behind.
Sales teams still need pipeline.
Operations teams still need coordination.
Finance teams still need reporting and analysis.
Engineering teams still need to build software.
What is changing is how the work gets done and what skills are required to do it well.
Right now we are in a transitional phase where companies are still labeling roles with โAIโ as they experiment with new workflows and technologies.
Over time, that label may disappear.
AI will simply become part of how work gets done.
And the roles themselves, while evolving, will look more familiar than the titles might suggest.