Contact Us
Questions, comments, ideas for future content? Contact us below.
I had a conversation with a family friend recently. Jack, a successful FinTech executive, found himself in need of job hunting advice. And he could no longer rely on his personal network.
Jack’s question: “Should I call the largest Executive Search firms to let them know I’m on the market so they can start working on my behalf?”
My response: “Sure…but don’t expect much from that.”
Which took him aback a bit.
Jack’s resume is, after all, quite impressive. A history of career-ascending moves with increasing leadership responsibilities.
Wouldn’t recruiters want to work with him?
The answer to this requires a bit of a primer in understanding the business model of the larger and more established executive search firms. And how these firms might not be the immediate go-to for Jack’s initial job search efforts.
These firms work on a retained basis. The client (the hiring company) agrees in contract to pay the full fee and engage only with the retained firm. This model locks in the search firm and provides a motivation to throw all its resources into completing the search as soon as possible. The search firm becomes a de facto extension of the client’s HR department. They work to develop a group of candidates that match the exacting specifications of the role.
When an executive like Jack calls into the executive search firm, there isn’t much they can do for him in the short term. Unless his background happens to match up to an ongoing client engagement. Not impossible but not probable.
It is still good practice for Jack to establish relationships with executive recruiters at the large search firms. As well as those at boutique firms that specialize in his practice area. They may be willing to take Jack’s call for networking purposes. Hint: it helps if they perceive Jack as a future client when he lands his next gig and then becomes in a position to hire.
So he should send along his resume to those established and specialized recruiters. Although these introductory conversations may be low probability in leading to a job offer, they are worthy of a 30 minute phone call. Especially if you are in a full-time job search mode.
The alternative to the retained search is the contingent model. This is where search firms agree to work on a search in which they’ll get paid a fee only if they present a candidate who gets hired by the client. In this case, the search firm will attempt to get Jack’s resume in front of as many companies as possible (and as fast as possible).
This can lead to more attention right away from employers but Jack and others in his situation should exercise caution. In the hands of an unscrupulous recruiter, your profile may be shared with clients without your consent. Which could create issues in the future if you attempt to present your resume to a hiring company. Their applicant tracking system (ATS) may then flag your resume as already in their system. This can be off-putting to a potential hiring company and cast a pall on your potential candidacy.
Some opportunities presented to you might not be spot-on fits for your background/level. But the contingent recruiter may push you to go through with interviews with the hope that something might work out. And this isn’t always a bad approach, especially if you’re open to casting a wide net. Going through with an interview, even if you’re not sure the role or the company are the best fit, isn’t the worst idea. It could serve as valuable interview “practice.” The hiring manager may also realize you are actually a better fit for another opening that is forthcoming.
The bottom line: You are in charge of your job search. Not a recruiter nor an executive search firm…you. Working with executive recruiters should be one of the dozens of ways that you go about looking for your next gig. But it is necessary to understand how to navigate and engage with executive search firms as you pursue your next role.
For further insight into successfully managing your job search:
https://careerwell.io/how-do-i-make-sure-my-resume-doesnt-end-up-in-a-blackhole/
https://careerwell.io/how-to-attack-your-job-search-like-a-salesperson/
https://careerwell.io/the-to-do-list-the-first-5-things-to-do-when-you-start-your-job-search/


Over the last year, hiring teams have started seeing a wave of new job titles pop up across tech, sales, and operations.
Some are legitimate new roles.
Others are existing jobs with a slightly different name.
And many of them have one thing in common: AI is suddenly part of the job description.
From Go-to-Market Engineers to AI Specialists, companies are experimenting with new roles as they figure out how automation and AI fit into their teams.
But most of these positions aren’t entirely new. They’re evolutions of existing roles.
One role that is gaining traction is the Go-to-Market Engineer.
Depending on who you ask, it is either:
In practice, it is a bit of both.
As Matt Tokarz recently pointed out after closing a search for an Outbound & Go-to-Market Specialist, the role looked very different from traditional RevOps. The focus was not reporting or CRM hygiene. It was building prompts, leveraging tools like Clay and Smartlead, and enabling SDRs and AEs with backend insights to accelerate pipeline growth.
Instead of traditional RevOps work like reporting and CRM management, the focus was on:
The goal was not simply managing sales data. It was accelerating pipeline generation through automation.
One trend is becoming clear. Companies are not replacing entire departments with AI.
Instead, they are changing how existing roles operate.
Sales teams still need pipeline.
Marketing teams still need content.
Engineering teams still need to build software.
The difference is that employers now expect candidates to use AI tools as part of their workflow.
As Zac Colip noted during the discussion, we are currently in a transitional phase where companies are labeling roles with “AI” as they experiment with how the technology fits into teams.
But that may not last forever.
Right now, AI still feels new enough that companies highlight it in job titles.
But eventually, AI will likely become a baseline expectation, not a specialty.
Think about it like cloud technology or data analytics.
At first, companies hired “cloud specialists.” Now most engineers are expected to understand cloud infrastructure.
The same shift will likely happen with AI.
Instead of hiring “AI-enabled marketers” or “AI engineers,” companies will simply expect employees to know how to work with AI tools.
One challenge with these emerging roles is simple: there aren’t many candidates with real experience yet.
Many of these positions didn’t exist two years ago.
In one recent search, we started looking for a candidate locally in Chicago. Eventually we expanded nationwide because the pool of people with relevant experience was extremely limited.
This is a common issue with emerging roles:
That gap will likely persist for the next few years.
Another noticeable shift is that roles are becoming more hybrid.
Instead of hiring for narrow responsibilities, companies are combining multiple functions into one position.
As Matt Mulcahy highlighted, one example is the rise of Forward Deployed Engineers, a model popularized by Palantir.
These engineers:
What used to involve several roles, including product managers, engineers, and solution architects, can now sometimes be handled by one person. AI development tools are part of what makes this possible.
Not every industry is moving at the same pace.
As Ashley DuBois pointed out, some sectors, such as transportation, are applying AI to specific workflows like load booking and operational automation.
At the same time, some companies are adding “AI” to job titles even when the core responsibilities remain largely traditional.
In many cases, it is still essentially an IT manager role with AI familiarity layered in.
This reflects a broader transition period where companies want to signal modernization and candidates want to signal relevance.
In logistics, AI is increasingly handling scheduling, tracking, and coordination tasks.
According to Brittany Lasky, operational roles such as logistics coordinators may experience the greatest impact from automation.
However, freight brokers who manage negotiation and strategic RFPs remain in demand.
AI can optimize processes. It does not replace relationship management or strategic negotiation.
Across industries, a pattern is emerging.
Execution becomes automated. Strategy becomes more valuable.
Automation is also reshaping finance and accounting roles.
As Adam Slater noted, accounts receivable jobs that once focused on high-volume manual processing are evolving into more analytical positions centered on reporting and insights.
The work is not disappearing. The expectations are increasing.
Organizations are now hiring for:
Even roles traditionally considered administrative now require deeper technical capability.
AI is not eliminating analyst roles. It is expanding them.
Financial analysts are also expected to understand tooling, sourcing, and data transformation.
In many cases, two or three roles are being combined into one.
This raises a long-term question.
If entry-level roles become more complex or disappear entirely, how will organizations develop senior talent in the future?
The traditional model of high-volume cold calling is changing.
According to Jack Smith and Emily Canna, teams are shifting toward:
At the same time, companies are moving away from activity-based KPIs and focusing more on outcomes such as demos set and SQLs generated.
In a market saturated with automated outreach, authentic communication has become a competitive advantage.
Several clients have said it directly. They want a human in the seat.
Every six to twelve months, hiring trends in go-to-market teams shift.
As Jennifer Salerno noted, companies move through cycles.
One quarter it is BDRs.
Then RevOps.
Now it is go-to-market engineers.
Many companies experimented heavily with AI to accelerate pipeline generation.
What those experiments exposed were structural gaps, particularly in outbound strategy.
AI can support execution. It does not replace a well-built top-of-funnel engine.
Inbound momentum can hide weaknesses. Outbound forces clarity.
The companies gaining traction right now are not chasing trends. They are rebuilding the fundamentals of their go-to-market strategy.
For employers, the takeaway is straightforward. Job descriptions and expectations need to evolve alongside technology.
Across functions, we are seeing the same shift play out. AI is not eliminating entire roles. It is changing how those roles operate and increasing the baseline skill set required to perform them well.
Hiring managers should start thinking less about traditional titles and more about capabilities. That often means prioritizing candidates who can:
In many cases, the perfect candidate with the exact title simply does not exist yet. The strongest hires are often people who have developed adjacent skills and shown the ability to adapt as the tools evolve.
The broader trend is that AI is accelerating a shift that was already underway.
Roles are becoming more hybrid. Expectations are increasing across nearly every function. And repetitive tasks are being automated, leaving more strategic work behind.
Sales teams still need pipeline.
Operations teams still need coordination.
Finance teams still need reporting and analysis.
Engineering teams still need to build software.
What is changing is how the work gets done and what skills are required to do it well.
Right now we are in a transitional phase where companies are still labeling roles with “AI” as they experiment with new workflows and technologies.
Over time, that label may disappear.
AI will simply become part of how work gets done.
And the roles themselves, while evolving, will look more familiar than the titles might suggest.