Contact Us
Questions, comments, ideas for future content? Contact us below.
The history of television perfectly explains the current state of workplace dissatisfaction. And why LinkedIn has become unreadable.
📺 Severance (2022–present)
📺 Silicon Valley (2014–2019)
📺 The Office (2005–2013)
📺 NewsRadio (1995–1999)
📺 Murphy Brown (1988–1998)
📺 The Mary Tyler Moore Show (1970–1977)
📺 The Dick Van Dyke Show (1961–1966)
📺 I Love Lucy (1951–1957) — okay, not a full workplace sitcom, but close enough.
Notice a trend?
TV has been satirizing the work forever. Because people have been complaining about work forever.
Absolutely nothing we’re experiencing is new.
Meanwhile, LinkedIn is stuck in reruns. Every day its recruiters are the problem. Hiring managers are the problem. Bad salespeople are the problem. Execs are the problems.
It’s the same show. Over and over..
Is it getting worse? I doubt it. I’m rewatching Mad Men and I have to tell you, things were way, way worse in the 1960s.
Now, I’m not dismissing anyone’s frustrations. Not at all. But two forces are intensifying today’s workplace angst:
1. The “Office Dork™️ Golden Age” Came and Went
2020–2022 was peak good times for white-collar workers.
Salaries went up. Remote work went up. Work life balance went up. Mental health awareness went up. Dare I say kindness went up.
And then some of it went back down.
👉I would never say “too much too fast” about any of these things. Except of course our expectations about how quickly positive change happens.
And speaking of expectations…
2. Elite Overproduction is driving disillusionment.
Want a single explanation for all these macro forces? Elite overproduction.
Never heard of it? Google it–err–have ChatGPT write you a summary and watch a few YouTube videos.
Take on massive student debt, get a degree, and an air-conditioned office—err, remote job—will be waiting.
It’s not working out as people hoped.
Why? We because we never needed this many Office Dorks™️ to begin with.
(Side note: Elite overproduction also preceded virtually every era of social instability and the fall of major civilizations. Happy Monday.)
I’ll get to the point. Work is called work for a reason. On some level, no matter what you do for a living, some of it sucks. And that’s never going to change.
👉The best piece of advice I’ve ever received: happiness is a choice.
It’s a decision you make, every day, to do things that bring you happiness. Or how you allow struggles to influence your mindset.
So you can allow the LinkedIn (or perhaps your company’s) echo chamber of negativity to blame everyone else for whatever it is that irks you the most.
Or.
Take a cue for the great sitcoms of the past and have a laugh.
Partner at Hirewell. #3 Ranked Sarcastic Commenter on LinkedIn.
If you’re hiring in 2026, you’re dealing with two realities at the same time.
First, traditional signals like degrees and pedigree are losing their value.
Second, Gen Z is reshaping expectations around speed, transparency, and trust.
Together, those forces are pushing talent acquisition into its next evolution.
As we outlined in Agentic HR Is Here: What Talent Acquisition Really Looks Like in 2026, recruiting is becoming more autonomous at the execution level. But autonomy alone doesn’t solve the core hiring problem.
You still need a better way to evaluate people.
That’s where skills-first hiring comes in.
For decades, degrees were used as a shortcut.
Not because they reliably predicted success, but because they reduced perceived risk and simplified decision-making.
That logic no longer holds.
Roles are changing too fast. Job titles mean less than they used to. And in a market where AI can generate a polished resume in seconds, pedigree is an even weaker signal.
Companies need capability, not credentials.
The bigger shift isn’t just skills-based hiring. It’s skills intelligence.
Instead of organizing work around static job descriptions, companies are starting to think in terms of capabilities. Work is assigned based on skill, not hierarchy or tenure.
This is the same evolution happening across workforce planning more broadly. Not headcount planning, but capability planning.
And it’s the only model that holds up in a fast-moving market.
Skills-first hiring is gaining traction because it solves multiple problems at once.
It improves quality of hire.
It increases internal mobility.
It reduces bias tied to pedigree.
And it aligns better with how work actually gets done.
But it’s also accelerating for a more practical reason.
The resume is no longer reliable.
As we covered in The AI-on-AI Hiring Arms Race, recruiting teams are now dealing with a flood of highly optimized, AI-generated applications. Many look great on paper and collapse under real scrutiny.
When that happens, skills-based evaluation stops being a “nice to have.” It becomes the only way to restore signal.
Now layer in Gen Z.
By 2026, Gen Z is one of the fastest-growing segments of the workforce. They are also the least tolerant of slow, opaque hiring processes.
One of the most important data points in the market right now is this:
A majority of Gen Z candidates will drop out if a hiring process exceeds 22 days.
Speed, to them, isn’t about impatience. It’s about competence.
If a company can’t run a clear, efficient hiring process, candidates assume it can’t run the business well either.
It’s a trust issue.
A large percentage of job seekers report that looking for work negatively impacts their mental health. The biggest driver isn’t rejection.
It’s silence.
Waiting to hear back. No closure. No clarity on next steps.
For Gen Z, that lack of transparency is a dealbreaker. It signals misalignment, not just poor communication.
In 2026, how you hire is inseparable from how you’re perceived as an employer.
For Gen Z, the hiring experience is part of the offer.
They expect:
If the process feels like a black box, they assume the culture is the same.
This is where skills-first hiring and agentic systems intersect. Technology can speed up execution, but only leadership can ensure the experience remains human.
The companies adapting fastest in 2026 are focused on a few fundamentals:
Skills-first hiring isn’t just about fairness. It’s about accuracy.
And Gen Z isn’t asking for special treatment. They’re forcing employers to modernize a hiring process that’s been broken for a long time.
The companies that adapt will hire better, faster, and with less churn. The companies that don’t will keep blaming the market while losing candidates to competitors who simply run a better process.
Most companies agree with skills-first hiring in theory. Very few have operationalized it in a way that actually improves outcomes. If you want help redesigning your hiring process for 2026, especially around skills-based evaluation and candidate experience, we can help. Reach out and we’ll walk you through what’s working right now.