Contact Us
Questions, comments, ideas for future content? Contact us below.
You guys, I’m not making this up: there are literally thousands of qualified (or reasonably qualified) people applying to a lot of job postings these days. And it’s the killer combo of:
Case in point: a contact of mine, a VP of Engineering with strong AI and Machine Learning applied for a Director of Machine Learning role and got the amusing reply below.
Now, I have a few differing thoughts on this:
👉At least the recruiter was honest. (Probably?)
👉No one has a great solution for how to deal with 1000+ applications.
👉Why would anyone connect with you for “the next one” if you didn’t give them the time of day for this one?
👉My contact asked “were they just building their database?” It’s a valid question. But no, I think that time has passed. Because:
👉Is it me or does Director of Machine Learning seems like a very different job that Director of Research (mentioned in the body)?
I’ll go with “who is someone who didn’t bother to customize their rejection letters from one job to the next?”
👉At least it’s a response. Seriously.
👉Perhaps they used an AI screening tool that determined a VP title eliminates him from consideration for a Director job even though the companies are very different sizes.
Anyway. If anyone needs a good tech leader, let me know…
Partner at Hirewell. #3 Ranked Sarcastic Commenter on LinkedIn.
Repeat after me: do not talk politics at work. Or on LinkedIn.
Or in job interviews. Or on first dates. Or at Thanksgiving dinner.
Unfortunately for those of us in the business world, 2025 ruined it. There’s just no way around the fact that tariffs are the issue driving the business climate right now. Every client, candidate, and partner is asking about it—or struggling because of it.
So maybe, just maybe, talking policy isn’t just okay—it’s necessary. Dare I say, productive.
So get ready for a little nuance from Jeff Smith and James Hornick in The 10 Minute Talent Rant, Episode 107, “Talk Policy, Not Politics”
Episode 107