Contact Us
Questions, comments, ideas for future content? Contact us below.
Something that drives me crazy: using the term “partnership” without explaining wtf that actually means.
It’s a lazy way of saying “we’re different” or “we’re better than our competition” or “we want you to listen to us” without explaining why.
I’ve made these mistakes plenty of times myself. In the agency recruiting world, there’s a big difference between transactional firms (aka resume mills who blast out minimally vetted resumes) and consultative firms (who do root causes analysis of hiring challenges & process issues and actually solve a problem.)
Which raises the real question: how should companies determine what sorts of recruiting agencies they work with? What’s the real “why” that agencies should be able to answer?
There’s really two things an agency should be able to do:
👉Find the right people faster than their client can on their own. (Top of funnel.)
👉Convert those people into new hires more efficiently than their client can. (Middle/bottom of funnel.) This is where true “partnering” comes in.
Drilling down more specifically into both of those:
1. Skill specialization
Do they have recruiters who know the skill domain cold?
Do they know it better than generalist recruiters?
Can they get in the weeds to build credibility with the candidates they’re recruiting?
(Or are they just repeating keywords?)
2. Bandwidth
Can they give internal recruiting and hiring teams their time back?
Do they have enough resources to take on the workload?
Can they vet in enough detail where their work doesn’t need to be double checked?
3. Industry experience
Are they familiar with the specifics of the industry demands?
Are they aware of specific challenges and quirks that go beyond skill based vetting?
4. Market experience
Do they know the specific challenges of a local geography?
5. Headhunting (no, it’s not a dirty word)
Do they go beyond posting jobs and hoping for the best?
Do you know how to target candidates who aren’t actively looking?
Do they know how to position your company in a compelling way that motivates people to want to work there?
Do they know how to phrase things in candidate-centric language and tell candidates what’s better about your company than their current role?
Can they sell?
6. Process knowledge
Do they know what makes the internal recruiting side of the hiring process succeed or fail?
Can you learn them?
Do you have deficiencies they can help you improve upon?
Hit me up with points 7, 8 and 9 that I forgot…
Partner at Hirewell. #3 Ranked Sarcastic Commenter on LinkedIn.
Plenty has been written about AI over the past two years. For much of that time, AI has been more hype than reality. I THINK 2026 is when that starts to change.
Here’s the first in a three part series of where we see AI going in the recruiting world.
———-
For the last few years, most companies treated AI like a recruiting assistant. It helped draft job descriptions, summarize resumes, and speed up outreach. Useful, sure. But it didn’t fundamentally change how hiring worked. And oftentimes, things needed to be double checked before hitting send.
I think that’s going to change.
In 2026, we’re seeing the rise of agentic HR. These are systems that don’t just support recruiters. They can execute work autonomously inside defined guardrails.
That shift is forcing talent leaders to rethink what recruiting teams are actually responsible for and what still requires a human.
Traditional recruiting AI waited for humans to click “next.”
Agentic systems don’t.
They can interpret real-time funnel data, align to hiring goals, and take multi-step action. That includes adjusting sourcing spend, coordinating interview schedules, and triggering workflow changes without manual oversight.
This isn’t automation layered onto old processes. It’s the early version of a self-driving recruiting function.
Time-to-fill and cost-per-hire still matter. They just don’t fully capture what’s changing.
A concept showing up more in 2026 is Return on Autonomy. It measures the value created when humans and autonomous systems are paired intentionally.
In plain terms, the question is simple.
Are we using technology to eliminate busywork, or are we just doing the same work faster?
Because speed doesn’t help if it leads to worse decisions, a weaker candidate experience, or more noise in the funnel.
As agentic systems absorb transactional work like screening, scheduling, and coordination, the role of recruiting leadership shifts.
The best TA leaders are spending less time managing process and more time doing what actually drives hiring outcomes. That includes aligning hiring to business priorities, building trust with candidates, and improving decision quality.
The real opportunity of 2026 isn’t more AI. It’s that recruiters finally get to focus on the work that requires being human.
Here’s the trap.
Companies adopt advanced recruiting technology but keep the same habits. Long approval chains. Inconsistent communication. Unclear evaluation criteria.
When that happens, speed increases, but trust collapses.
Candidates don’t experience innovation. They experience silence, confusion, and a process that feels even more impersonal than before.
In 2026, the human experience of hiring is becoming a differentiator again because so many companies are getting it wrong.
You don’t need a total rebuild tomorrow. But you do need clarity.
The companies winning in 2026 are asking the right questions.
What parts of our hiring process truly require human judgment?
Where are we slowing things down out of habit?
Are recruiters trained for strategic work, or just process management?
Do our systems increase transparency, or just efficiency?
These aren’t technology questions. They’re leadership questions.
Agentic HR is changing how recruiting works. It’s also creating a new challenge.
As employers deploy autonomous systems, candidates are doing the same. The result is an emerging AI-on-AI hiring arms race that’s flooding pipelines with highly optimized but low-trust applications.
Next in this series: The AI-on-AI Hiring Arms Race and How to Protect Hiring Quality Without Breaking Trust
A lot of companies are going to try to AI their way into faster hiring this year and still end up with worse results. If you want to build a recruiting model that actually works in 2026, one that balances speed, quality, and credibility, we can help. Reach out if you want a second set of eyes on your hiring approach.