Contact Us
Questions, comments, ideas for future content? Contact us below.
Does mental health affect productivity at work? Yes, it sure does and loss of productivity = loss of revenue = something leadership should care about.
“The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that depression and anxiety cost the global economy $1 trillion per year in lost productivity. But WHO also found that for every $1 spent on treating common mental health concerns, there is a return of $4 in improved health and productivity” (Rawe Workplace Mental Health: 5 ways to support employee wellness).
What can the company do?
What can managers do?
We all know that it is easier to log off early if your manager encourages it. A manager modeling healthy behavior can benefit the team’s work life balance. If you are a manager, I encourage you to share your healthy practices. Healthy practices = unreachable during PTO, logging off at a decent hour, taking your lunch and breaks throughout the day, etc. You should lead your team by example, and it could make a huge difference in the culture, productivity, and overall morale of your team.
What can you do?
In general, there are many approaches to improving mental health and overall wellbeing. Many of these consist of common themes encompassing a holistic view such as the approach suggested by the Mental Health Foundation of New Zealand. They use an approach called the “Five Ways to Wellbeing” (1) or as I like to share it with others “Taking 5.”
There are five great pointers and most of these actions could literally take five minutes or less to do. You do not have to do all of them in one go in order to achieve the benefits. These are more like five different suggestions you can pick and choose from by weighing in with how you’re feeling, acknowledging what you need, and then doing that one thing! These can apply to both our personal and professional life, but let’s take a look at how we can use them in the workplace:
Take 5 is a great starting point for addressing and managing your own wellbeing, but what about bringing it into conversation with someone else? This might come up in a convo as manager to employee or colleague to colleague. Talking about health can be tricky to navigate and there are definitely right and wrong ways to go about it. As a general rule of thumb, do not try to be a doctor or a therapist if you are not a doctor or a therapist! There are some very helpful methods out there that we can use to address wellbeing topics gracefully. A great one to keep in your back pocket is the OARS method (4).
Regardless of seniority in an organization, everyone can benefit from having a solid understanding of wellbeing principles and having the ability and confidence to communicate them. Leadership that addresses employee wellbeing as something just as important as performance will result in better culture, productivity, and overall success across the organization. On an individual level, it is important to remember that one’s health is not separated by personal and professional life, so taking accountability for your own wellbeing is one the most important things we can do for ourselves on a regular basis.
Plenty has been written about AI over the past two years. For much of that time, AI has been more hype than reality. I THINK 2026 is when that starts to change.
Here’s the first in a three part series of where we see AI going in the recruiting world.
———-
For the last few years, most companies treated AI like a recruiting assistant. It helped draft job descriptions, summarize resumes, and speed up outreach. Useful, sure. But it didn’t fundamentally change how hiring worked. And oftentimes, things needed to be double checked before hitting send.
I think that’s going to change.
In 2026, we’re seeing the rise of agentic HR. These are systems that don’t just support recruiters. They can execute work autonomously inside defined guardrails.
That shift is forcing talent leaders to rethink what recruiting teams are actually responsible for and what still requires a human.
Traditional recruiting AI waited for humans to click “next.”
Agentic systems don’t.
They can interpret real-time funnel data, align to hiring goals, and take multi-step action. That includes adjusting sourcing spend, coordinating interview schedules, and triggering workflow changes without manual oversight.
This isn’t automation layered onto old processes. It’s the early version of a self-driving recruiting function.
Time-to-fill and cost-per-hire still matter. They just don’t fully capture what’s changing.
A concept showing up more in 2026 is Return on Autonomy. It measures the value created when humans and autonomous systems are paired intentionally.
In plain terms, the question is simple.
Are we using technology to eliminate busywork, or are we just doing the same work faster?
Because speed doesn’t help if it leads to worse decisions, a weaker candidate experience, or more noise in the funnel.
As agentic systems absorb transactional work like screening, scheduling, and coordination, the role of recruiting leadership shifts.
The best TA leaders are spending less time managing process and more time doing what actually drives hiring outcomes. That includes aligning hiring to business priorities, building trust with candidates, and improving decision quality.
The real opportunity of 2026 isn’t more AI. It’s that recruiters finally get to focus on the work that requires being human.
Here’s the trap.
Companies adopt advanced recruiting technology but keep the same habits. Long approval chains. Inconsistent communication. Unclear evaluation criteria.
When that happens, speed increases, but trust collapses.
Candidates don’t experience innovation. They experience silence, confusion, and a process that feels even more impersonal than before.
In 2026, the human experience of hiring is becoming a differentiator again because so many companies are getting it wrong.
You don’t need a total rebuild tomorrow. But you do need clarity.
The companies winning in 2026 are asking the right questions.
What parts of our hiring process truly require human judgment?
Where are we slowing things down out of habit?
Are recruiters trained for strategic work, or just process management?
Do our systems increase transparency, or just efficiency?
These aren’t technology questions. They’re leadership questions.
Agentic HR is changing how recruiting works. It’s also creating a new challenge.
As employers deploy autonomous systems, candidates are doing the same. The result is an emerging AI-on-AI hiring arms race that’s flooding pipelines with highly optimized but low-trust applications.
Next in this series: The AI-on-AI Hiring Arms Race and How to Protect Hiring Quality Without Breaking Trust
A lot of companies are going to try to AI their way into faster hiring this year and still end up with worse results. If you want to build a recruiting model that actually works in 2026, one that balances speed, quality, and credibility, we can help. Reach out if you want a second set of eyes on your hiring approach.