Contact Us
Questions, comments, ideas for future content? Contact us below.
Successful hiring doesn’t just magically happen
New trend we’ve noticed over the past 2 weeks: companies scaling up hiring again, but they don’t have enough (or any) internal recruiters to do it.
Because they cut them all last year.
We saw this phenomenon in 2021. And it appears we’re seeing it again now. (Admittedly to a lesser extent. I don’t believe hiring will go crazy again until there’s a macro shift in interest rates & the cost of money for fundraising.)
There’s a problem with the talent strategy of “hire & fire your internal recruiters with every cycle shift” approach: it’s not a strategy. It’s as reactive as it gets. (And I say this as someone who 100% benefits from it. The reason why we’re seeing this trend is because companies are coming to us needing help.)
Any time you cut your entire internal recruiting team, a two things happened:
1. You lose all your domain and process knowledge. All the people who know the ins and outs of how your organization hires are gone. You start over from scratch.
How to best partner with the hiring managers. What worked/didn’t work on previous similar searches. How to ‘sell’ your company to job seekers. Relationships built with future possible candidates from previous searches. All the fun things you learn to do better every time a search turns into a trainwreck.
These things take time to hone. And they’re all out the window. The newbie will start from scratch.
2. Anyone left realizes you didn’t learn anything from the last hire/fire cycle.
Layoffs are always unfortunate, but sometimes necessary for a business to survive. Yet repeating the up and down process without asking yourself “is there a better way to do this?” is well, insane. Or just lazy. And no one wants to work for a lazy, crazy company.
(Fun fact: “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.” was from Rita Mae Brown, not Albert Einstein. You learned something today…)
The point? There’s a better way of doing this. You need:
👉Visionary HR and Talent Acquisition leaders who aren’t still running the 1990’s talent playbook.
If the entirety of your hiring strategy is ‘hire internal recruiters and only use contingent agencies as a last resort’ you’re feeding right into the trap.
👉Find strategic recruiting partners who can integrate with your team, scale up and down as need comes & go, and price things appropriately.
The most innovative things in the recruiting space aren’t faux AI technologies. It’s firms that found the ‘best of all worlds’ approach so you can retain your domain knowledge, get help when you need it (not when you don’t), do the internal heavy lifting (not just source resumes) and not price gouge you.
Hirewell is one of them. Hit me up before you jump back on the crazy train.
Partner at Hirewell. #3 Ranked Sarcastic Commenter on LinkedIn.
If you’re hiring in 2026, you’re dealing with two realities at the same time.
First, traditional signals like degrees and pedigree are losing their value.
Second, Gen Z is reshaping expectations around speed, transparency, and trust.
Together, those forces are pushing talent acquisition into its next evolution.
As we outlined in Agentic HR Is Here: What Talent Acquisition Really Looks Like in 2026, recruiting is becoming more autonomous at the execution level. But autonomy alone doesn’t solve the core hiring problem.
You still need a better way to evaluate people.
That’s where skills-first hiring comes in.
For decades, degrees were used as a shortcut.
Not because they reliably predicted success, but because they reduced perceived risk and simplified decision-making.
That logic no longer holds.
Roles are changing too fast. Job titles mean less than they used to. And in a market where AI can generate a polished resume in seconds, pedigree is an even weaker signal.
Companies need capability, not credentials.
The bigger shift isn’t just skills-based hiring. It’s skills intelligence.
Instead of organizing work around static job descriptions, companies are starting to think in terms of capabilities. Work is assigned based on skill, not hierarchy or tenure.
This is the same evolution happening across workforce planning more broadly. Not headcount planning, but capability planning.
And it’s the only model that holds up in a fast-moving market.
Skills-first hiring is gaining traction because it solves multiple problems at once.
It improves quality of hire.
It increases internal mobility.
It reduces bias tied to pedigree.
And it aligns better with how work actually gets done.
But it’s also accelerating for a more practical reason.
The resume is no longer reliable.
As we covered in The AI-on-AI Hiring Arms Race, recruiting teams are now dealing with a flood of highly optimized, AI-generated applications. Many look great on paper and collapse under real scrutiny.
When that happens, skills-based evaluation stops being a “nice to have.” It becomes the only way to restore signal.
Now layer in Gen Z.
By 2026, Gen Z is one of the fastest-growing segments of the workforce. They are also the least tolerant of slow, opaque hiring processes.
One of the most important data points in the market right now is this:
A majority of Gen Z candidates will drop out if a hiring process exceeds 22 days.
Speed, to them, isn’t about impatience. It’s about competence.
If a company can’t run a clear, efficient hiring process, candidates assume it can’t run the business well either.
It’s a trust issue.
A large percentage of job seekers report that looking for work negatively impacts their mental health. The biggest driver isn’t rejection.
It’s silence.
Waiting to hear back. No closure. No clarity on next steps.
For Gen Z, that lack of transparency is a dealbreaker. It signals misalignment, not just poor communication.
In 2026, how you hire is inseparable from how you’re perceived as an employer.
For Gen Z, the hiring experience is part of the offer.
They expect:
If the process feels like a black box, they assume the culture is the same.
This is where skills-first hiring and agentic systems intersect. Technology can speed up execution, but only leadership can ensure the experience remains human.
The companies adapting fastest in 2026 are focused on a few fundamentals:
Skills-first hiring isn’t just about fairness. It’s about accuracy.
And Gen Z isn’t asking for special treatment. They’re forcing employers to modernize a hiring process that’s been broken for a long time.
The companies that adapt will hire better, faster, and with less churn. The companies that don’t will keep blaming the market while losing candidates to competitors who simply run a better process.
Most companies agree with skills-first hiring in theory. Very few have operationalized it in a way that actually improves outcomes. If you want help redesigning your hiring process for 2026, especially around skills-based evaluation and candidate experience, we can help. Reach out and we’ll walk you through what’s working right now.