Contact Us
Questions, comments, ideas for future content? Contact us below.
We are about ⅔ through 2020 (thankfully) and thought it was an opportune time to look at what has happened in a year that has felt like a decade. Looking at the trends in tech hiring over the last eight months makes that clear – there really have been three distinct phases to 2020. We’ve seen the tech hiring market swing wildly this year.
Phase 1: Jan – March 9
In February, the tech job market was red hot – tech job postings were up 29% from 2019, and unemployment in the space was practically zero. By March, things started to trend down. Particularly in the industries that were hammered by COVID (Hospitality, Food, and Transportation).

Phase 2: Shelter in Place (April – early June)
Fast forward a few months to Q2, and we saw something completely different. Job postings dropped 15%.

If your company was actively hiring in April. Congrats. You were able to tap into a once in a decade (plus) window when great tech talent was actively looking. Approximately 40,000 people were laid off from tech companies from March 11 – May 31.

But if you blinked (as most companies did) – you missed it. Because starting in June – hiring quickly accelerated.
Phase 3: The back half of 2020
If you look deeper at the Q2 data, things really started to open up in June. There was a massive jump from May to June (25% increase in posting in the 25 largest markets).

So yeah, it has been a crazy market, to say the least. What does that mean for tech talent that is available and how has it impacted skyrocketing tech salaries? Unfortunately, not much. Many of those were engineers. But as you can imagine, much of that top talent was sucked up by Google, Facebook, Amazon, etc. The strong keep getting stronger.
Salary Trends
When companies began to dip their toes into the hiring process – most had the same thought. Unemployment if >15% – we finally have a buyers market. Unfortunately for them – the window had already closed. And salaries never really dipped, because demand still greatly exceeds supply.
With that in mind, we thought it was a good time to update our Salary Trends Data.
Last year, we’d developed a tool to aggregate public-facing salary information with our own data (over 500 individual surveys with job seekers and over 300 specific engineering hires that we facilitated).
This year, we went one step further. We combined our internal salary data (300+ placements) with Holistic’s tech salary data (2500 additional data points). We think this is far superior to other salary surveys that are often crowd-sourced. Believe it or not, people sometimes lie about their salary.
Take a look:


We saw year over year increases across the board (3-15%). The biggest jump was at the software engineer level. For years, we’ve seen entry-level salaries increase, so it isn’t surprising to see these numbers go up in this group (nearly 15%). To add some context here, we were able to cast a wider net this year – so last year’s numbers could have been skewed by a smaller data pool.
We saw salaries increase for Senior and Principal Engineers, but much more modestly (3-4%).
Salary Trends – Technology Leadership

An interesting trend we saw last year, that is even more pronounced – Principal Engineers earn roughly 10% more than engineering managers. While both roles are vital – it shows that engineers aren’t’ forced into the management ‘path’. In fact, they initially earn more by staying technical. Until they reach the Director/VP level.
Other Trends
Scheduling interviews has consistently been extremely time consuming and a logistical nightmare for many companies. With everyone remote and relying on zoom/video interviews, things have gotten much smoother.
Remote work has become more of a thing. Surprised? Me neither. As with most things in tech, when the big companies do something (Facebook, Twitter, Google, etc.) there is a rush to follow. In May, there was a 28% increase in remote job postings. Based on conversations we’ve had with clients and contacts, I’d venture to say that number is very conservative. What started as a temporary WFH arrangement has resulted in either permanent WFH, or at least for 6-12+ months. It will be fascinating to see how that plays out. But you can be sure, it will be awfully challenging to get tech workers to come back to the office when this is all behind us.
We’ve seen salaries spike for all engineering roles, but salaries for Java engineers have continued to out-pace those of .Net Engineers and other Open Source Engineers (think Ruby, Python or Full stack).
For Tech candidates overall, making an impact continues to be important. Top-tier candidates may want equity, and might be willing to take less salary if they know their work will make an impact on the world.
Meanwhile, Cloud and DevOps positions may not get as much attention as software engineering roles but they’re one of the fastest growing areas in the sector.
Want to see the full report – click here!
Final Thoughts
The market continues to evolve. Tech candidates need to know their worth—and so do the companies hiring them. And both need to stay on top of the trends. Further, Tech candidates want to have an impact on the world, and we want to ensure they find positions that enable them to do so.
Hirewell is Your Partner in Understanding the Current Salary Trends for the Roles Your Organization is Looking to Fill. We’re also here to provide you with the insights you need to make smart decisions.
Finally, our data is specific to Chicago, but if you want to compare data in Chicago to other cities, we recommend you visit Nerdwallet’s cost of living calculator.
Over the last year, hiring teams have started seeing a wave of new job titles pop up across tech, sales, and operations.
Some are legitimate new roles.
Others are existing jobs with a slightly different name.
And many of them have one thing in common: AI is suddenly part of the job description.
From Go-to-Market Engineers to AI Specialists, companies are experimenting with new roles as they figure out how automation and AI fit into their teams.
But most of these positions aren’t entirely new. They’re evolutions of existing roles.
One role that is gaining traction is the Go-to-Market Engineer.
Depending on who you ask, it is either:
In practice, it is a bit of both.
As Matt Tokarz recently pointed out after closing a search for an Outbound & Go-to-Market Specialist, the role looked very different from traditional RevOps. The focus was not reporting or CRM hygiene. It was building prompts, leveraging tools like Clay and Smartlead, and enabling SDRs and AEs with backend insights to accelerate pipeline growth.
Instead of traditional RevOps work like reporting and CRM management, the focus was on:
The goal was not simply managing sales data. It was accelerating pipeline generation through automation.
One trend is becoming clear. Companies are not replacing entire departments with AI.
Instead, they are changing how existing roles operate.
Sales teams still need pipeline.
Marketing teams still need content.
Engineering teams still need to build software.
The difference is that employers now expect candidates to use AI tools as part of their workflow.
As Zac Colip noted during the discussion, we are currently in a transitional phase where companies are labeling roles with “AI” as they experiment with how the technology fits into teams.
But that may not last forever.
Right now, AI still feels new enough that companies highlight it in job titles.
But eventually, AI will likely become a baseline expectation, not a specialty.
Think about it like cloud technology or data analytics.
At first, companies hired “cloud specialists.” Now most engineers are expected to understand cloud infrastructure.
The same shift will likely happen with AI.
Instead of hiring “AI-enabled marketers” or “AI engineers,” companies will simply expect employees to know how to work with AI tools.
One challenge with these emerging roles is simple: there aren’t many candidates with real experience yet.
Many of these positions didn’t exist two years ago.
In one recent search, we started looking for a candidate locally in Chicago. Eventually we expanded nationwide because the pool of people with relevant experience was extremely limited.
This is a common issue with emerging roles:
That gap will likely persist for the next few years.
Another noticeable shift is that roles are becoming more hybrid.
Instead of hiring for narrow responsibilities, companies are combining multiple functions into one position.
As Matt Mulcahy highlighted, one example is the rise of Forward Deployed Engineers, a model popularized by Palantir.
These engineers:
What used to involve several roles, including product managers, engineers, and solution architects, can now sometimes be handled by one person. AI development tools are part of what makes this possible.
Not every industry is moving at the same pace.
As Ashley DuBois pointed out, some sectors, such as transportation, are applying AI to specific workflows like load booking and operational automation.
At the same time, some companies are adding “AI” to job titles even when the core responsibilities remain largely traditional.
In many cases, it is still essentially an IT manager role with AI familiarity layered in.
This reflects a broader transition period where companies want to signal modernization and candidates want to signal relevance.
In logistics, AI is increasingly handling scheduling, tracking, and coordination tasks.
According to Brittany Lasky, operational roles such as logistics coordinators may experience the greatest impact from automation.
However, freight brokers who manage negotiation and strategic RFPs remain in demand.
AI can optimize processes. It does not replace relationship management or strategic negotiation.
Across industries, a pattern is emerging.
Execution becomes automated. Strategy becomes more valuable.
Automation is also reshaping finance and accounting roles.
As Adam Slater noted, accounts receivable jobs that once focused on high-volume manual processing are evolving into more analytical positions centered on reporting and insights.
The work is not disappearing. The expectations are increasing.
Organizations are now hiring for:
Even roles traditionally considered administrative now require deeper technical capability.
AI is not eliminating analyst roles. It is expanding them.
Financial analysts are also expected to understand tooling, sourcing, and data transformation.
In many cases, two or three roles are being combined into one.
This raises a long-term question.
If entry-level roles become more complex or disappear entirely, how will organizations develop senior talent in the future?
The traditional model of high-volume cold calling is changing.
According to Jack Smith and Emily Canna, teams are shifting toward:
At the same time, companies are moving away from activity-based KPIs and focusing more on outcomes such as demos set and SQLs generated.
In a market saturated with automated outreach, authentic communication has become a competitive advantage.
Several clients have said it directly. They want a human in the seat.
Every six to twelve months, hiring trends in go-to-market teams shift.
As Jennifer Salerno noted, companies move through cycles.
One quarter it is BDRs.
Then RevOps.
Now it is go-to-market engineers.
Many companies experimented heavily with AI to accelerate pipeline generation.
What those experiments exposed were structural gaps, particularly in outbound strategy.
AI can support execution. It does not replace a well-built top-of-funnel engine.
Inbound momentum can hide weaknesses. Outbound forces clarity.
The companies gaining traction right now are not chasing trends. They are rebuilding the fundamentals of their go-to-market strategy.
For employers, the takeaway is straightforward. Job descriptions and expectations need to evolve alongside technology.
Across functions, we are seeing the same shift play out. AI is not eliminating entire roles. It is changing how those roles operate and increasing the baseline skill set required to perform them well.
Hiring managers should start thinking less about traditional titles and more about capabilities. That often means prioritizing candidates who can:
In many cases, the perfect candidate with the exact title simply does not exist yet. The strongest hires are often people who have developed adjacent skills and shown the ability to adapt as the tools evolve.
The broader trend is that AI is accelerating a shift that was already underway.
Roles are becoming more hybrid. Expectations are increasing across nearly every function. And repetitive tasks are being automated, leaving more strategic work behind.
Sales teams still need pipeline.
Operations teams still need coordination.
Finance teams still need reporting and analysis.
Engineering teams still need to build software.
What is changing is how the work gets done and what skills are required to do it well.
Right now we are in a transitional phase where companies are still labeling roles with “AI” as they experiment with new workflows and technologies.
Over time, that label may disappear.
AI will simply become part of how work gets done.
And the roles themselves, while evolving, will look more familiar than the titles might suggest.