Contact Us
Questions, comments, ideas for future content? Contact us below.
Meet the new plan, same as the old plan.
Prediction for 2025: Businesses will repeat past mistakes by hiring internal recruiters for short-term needs, only to lay them off at the first hint of a downturn uncertainty.
Yup, starting my Tuesday in full cynicism mode. Well, not entirely. Implied in my prediction is that hiring is on the rise to begin with. So let’s start there.
Hirewell just had a massive 4 month stretch with August and November being our 2 biggest months since early 2022. We closed 20 large multi-hire solutions (double to triple digit hires) since May 1. Compared to the whopping 5 we did all of 2023.
Now, I’m friends with a lot of other agency owners who aren’t seeing this type of rebound. And that’s because the growth across industries and skill sets are asymmetrical. Finance & accounting, industrial, and sales recruiting (especially in non-tech industries) are booming. More so than things like tech and marketing. But those areas are starting to come back as well.
It really depends what your recruiting focus is.
Anyway, I feel good about 2025 overall. It won’t be the rampant over-hiring we saw in 2021, but that’s not a bad thing.
On top of that, we’re finally hearing contacts in HR talk about hiring internal recruiters. Which is another focus area for us, so that also brings a smile to my face.
Unless of course we see what we saw last time: perm hires made for temporary needs and internal TA folks ending up on the street again a short time later.
Hiring and firing internal recruiters has been the go to playbook since forever. Despite employees being the most critical element to success (and the biggest expense) for most companies, recruiting is still treated as a reactive function by lots of companies.
Thus my cynicism. I’ve seen this movie before.
Except this time, I don’t know if the best recruiters are going to play ball. I mean, who wants to sign up for another round of that? I also know plenty of internal recruiters who went to agencies, started their own shops, or chose indy recruiting. Because why not bet on yourself?
Firms stuck in mid-2000s thinking still look at recruiting as the false dichotomy of hire internal vs use contingent agencies. But there’s a whole world of better options (modern RPOs, project-based recruiting, etc.) that are more affordable and scalable with better results than hiring & firing ad nauseam.
Who knows? Maybe this is the year I’ll be wrong and strategic recruiting will finally win out.
Partner at Hirewell. #3 Ranked Sarcastic Commenter on LinkedIn.
Over the last year, hiring teams have started seeing a wave of new job titles pop up across tech, sales, and operations.
Some are legitimate new roles.
Others are existing jobs with a slightly different name.
And many of them have one thing in common: AI is suddenly part of the job description.
From Go-to-Market Engineers to AI Specialists, companies are experimenting with new roles as they figure out how automation and AI fit into their teams.
But most of these positions aren’t entirely new. They’re evolutions of existing roles.
One role that’s gaining traction is the Go-to-Market Engineer.
Depending on who you ask, it’s either:
In practice, it’s a bit of both.
We recently worked on a role called an Outbound & Go-to-Market Specialist. Instead of traditional RevOps work like reporting and CRM management, the focus was on:
The goal wasn’t just managing sales data. It was accelerating pipeline generation through automation.
In other words, the role was designed to help SDRs and AEs move faster.
One trend is becoming clear: companies aren’t replacing entire departments with AI.
Instead, they’re changing how existing roles operate.
Sales teams still need pipeline.
Marketing teams still need content.
Engineering teams still need to build software.
The difference is that employers now expect candidates to use AI tools as part of the workflow.
That’s why we’re seeing so many job titles that start with “AI.” But that may not last forever.
Right now, AI still feels new enough that companies highlight it in job titles.
But eventually, AI will likely become a baseline expectation, not a specialty.
Think about it like cloud technology or data analytics.
At first, companies hired “cloud specialists.” Now most engineers are expected to understand cloud infrastructure.
The same shift will likely happen with AI.
Instead of hiring “AI-enabled marketers” or “AI engineers,” companies will simply expect employees to know how to work with AI tools.
One challenge with these emerging roles is simple: there aren’t many candidates with real experience yet.
Many of these positions didn’t exist two years ago.
In one recent search, we started looking for a candidate locally in Chicago. Eventually we expanded nationwide because the pool of people with relevant experience was extremely limited.
This is a common issue with emerging roles:
That gap will likely persist for the next few years.
Another noticeable shift is that roles are becoming more hybrid.
Instead of hiring for narrow responsibilities, companies are combining multiple functions into one position.
For example:
Forward Deployed Engineers
A model popularized by Palantir, these engineers:
That used to involve several roles: product managers, engineers, and solution architects.
Now, AI tools allow one person to cover more ground.
Similar changes are happening in other functions as well:
Automation removes repetitive tasks, leaving more strategic work behind.
For employers, the takeaway is straightforward.
Job descriptions need to evolve alongside technology.
Instead of focusing only on traditional experience, hiring managers should consider:
Because in many cases, the perfect candidate with the exact title simply doesn’t exist yet.
We’re currently in a transitional phase in hiring.
AI is changing how work gets done, which means job titles, responsibilities, and expectations are shifting quickly.
But most of these “new” roles aren’t entirely new professions.
They’re existing jobs adapting to new technology.
And as companies continue experimenting with AI, the titles may keep changing.
The work itself, however, is likely to look familiar.