Contact Us
Questions, comments, ideas for future content? Contact us below.
You want to earn as much money as possible and there really is no simple answer for achieving this. The easiest thing to do is test the job market and find out how much you’re worth. But why not be prepared?
We work with job seekers regularly to advise them on how to think about where they are in their job, where they want to be and what type of salary they can expect. Here’s our advice to you:
How To Determine How Much You’re Worth
The following is a list of tools and thoughtful steps you need to determine your worth both within your organization and your field:
A word of caution as you get started: ultimately you can ask for whatever you want, but you run the risk of pricing yourself out of an opportunity if your skills and experience do not warrant the price tag. Be as prepared as possible when determining your worth, but also be realistic.
You can check websites, job postings, and network with colleagues working within your occupation or field as a starting point. You can also factor in your current compensation and any other offers you’ve gotten… and you should. You need to understand however, that companies ultimately make compensation decisions based upon not only market data, but their budget, and how a particular candidate’s skills and experience relate to those data points. Companies will also compare your skills and experience to their existing team and how well you relate to the open role and the team you’re joining.
That said . . .
Knowing how companies think about your worth doesn’t mean you shouldn’t seek to determine your worth, however, and we encourage you to consider the below scenarios (some of which has been drawn from the posts “How Much Am I Worth? – 5 Ways to Figure it Out” on Salary.com and “How To Negotiate Your Salary When You Have No Obvious Leverage” on Fast Company respectively) as you seek to do so:
Experience & Skills
What you bring to the table can make all the difference. For example, you need to assess your previous work experience, especially how it relates to the position you seek. And if you’ve had a gap in employment, look to incorporate any volunteer work or educational classes that pertain to the job as well.
This is where the STAR approach can be helpful as well… STAR is an acronym for situation or task, action, and result, and the focus of STAR is to share a work scenario, for example, one which led to a conflict, the actions you took to resolve it and the result of these actions, to reflect experience that you otherwise may be lacking.
Similarly, if you don’t have experience in a field you are looking to enter, at least show that you have knowledge of that field, how you gained it, and that you can speak industry.
Companies ultimately make compensation decisions based upon market data, their budget, and how a particular candidate’s skills and experience relate to those things. They’ll compare that person’s skills and experience to their existing team and how well they relate to the open role and the team he/she is joining.
This doesn’t mean you shouldn’t understand what you’re worth, but it does mean you need to be prepared to discuss your worth, and to do that we encourage you to:
If you have questions about determining how much you’re worth, we’re here to help.
If you’re hiring in 2026, you’re dealing with two realities at the same time.
First, traditional signals like degrees and pedigree are losing their value.
Second, Gen Z is reshaping expectations around speed, transparency, and trust.
Together, those forces are pushing talent acquisition into its next evolution.
As we outlined in Agentic HR Is Here: What Talent Acquisition Really Looks Like in 2026, recruiting is becoming more autonomous at the execution level. But autonomy alone doesn’t solve the core hiring problem.
You still need a better way to evaluate people.
That’s where skills-first hiring comes in.
For decades, degrees were used as a shortcut.
Not because they reliably predicted success, but because they reduced perceived risk and simplified decision-making.
That logic no longer holds.
Roles are changing too fast. Job titles mean less than they used to. And in a market where AI can generate a polished resume in seconds, pedigree is an even weaker signal.
Companies need capability, not credentials.
The bigger shift isn’t just skills-based hiring. It’s skills intelligence.
Instead of organizing work around static job descriptions, companies are starting to think in terms of capabilities. Work is assigned based on skill, not hierarchy or tenure.
This is the same evolution happening across workforce planning more broadly. Not headcount planning, but capability planning.
And it’s the only model that holds up in a fast-moving market.
Skills-first hiring is gaining traction because it solves multiple problems at once.
It improves quality of hire.
It increases internal mobility.
It reduces bias tied to pedigree.
And it aligns better with how work actually gets done.
But it’s also accelerating for a more practical reason.
The resume is no longer reliable.
As we covered in The AI-on-AI Hiring Arms Race, recruiting teams are now dealing with a flood of highly optimized, AI-generated applications. Many look great on paper and collapse under real scrutiny.
When that happens, skills-based evaluation stops being a “nice to have.” It becomes the only way to restore signal.
Now layer in Gen Z.
By 2026, Gen Z is one of the fastest-growing segments of the workforce. They are also the least tolerant of slow, opaque hiring processes.
One of the most important data points in the market right now is this:
A majority of Gen Z candidates will drop out if a hiring process exceeds 22 days.
Speed, to them, isn’t about impatience. It’s about competence.
If a company can’t run a clear, efficient hiring process, candidates assume it can’t run the business well either.
It’s a trust issue.
A large percentage of job seekers report that looking for work negatively impacts their mental health. The biggest driver isn’t rejection.
It’s silence.
Waiting to hear back. No closure. No clarity on next steps.
For Gen Z, that lack of transparency is a dealbreaker. It signals misalignment, not just poor communication.
In 2026, how you hire is inseparable from how you’re perceived as an employer.
For Gen Z, the hiring experience is part of the offer.
They expect:
If the process feels like a black box, they assume the culture is the same.
This is where skills-first hiring and agentic systems intersect. Technology can speed up execution, but only leadership can ensure the experience remains human.
The companies adapting fastest in 2026 are focused on a few fundamentals:
Skills-first hiring isn’t just about fairness. It’s about accuracy.
And Gen Z isn’t asking for special treatment. They’re forcing employers to modernize a hiring process that’s been broken for a long time.
The companies that adapt will hire better, faster, and with less churn. The companies that don’t will keep blaming the market while losing candidates to competitors who simply run a better process.
Most companies agree with skills-first hiring in theory. Very few have operationalized it in a way that actually improves outcomes. If you want help redesigning your hiring process for 2026, especially around skills-based evaluation and candidate experience, we can help. Reach out and we’ll walk you through what’s working right now.