Contact Us
Questions, comments, ideas for future content? Contact us below.
Not everyone has visibility into every issue
Today’s edition of Hills I’ll Die On™️: hiring issues persist because people at the top don’t realize they’re issues to begin with.
And let me say this twice so it’s clear. It’s not “leadership doesn’t care” it’s “leadership doesn’t know.” (Most of the time.)
Leaders are primarily concerned with 3 things: Making the product. Selling the product. And having the people needed to do it. If those things are happening, what’s the issue?
From a hiring perspective, butts in seats is far and away the primary goal. Everything else is style points. And more importantly, someone else’s job to worry about. (HR, hiring managers, recruiters, etc.)
But with hiring, those style points do matter. Every bad review or word out mouth means tripling the effort to generate the same top of funnel interest. Every extra step added at the last minute casts doubt in the candidate’s mind and gives your hiring competitors the upper hand. And every declined offer means more time and money spent doing the job all over again. Yay double work.
That last part is important. Hiring costs time and money. Even if the job is getting done, how did you lose in the inefficiencies? How much more value could your team provide if they weren’t doing the job twice?
These are normal, human organizational problems. If you’re not in the weeds (and no CEO can be) you simply don’t have visibility into this. Out of sight, out of mind isn’t something that can be fixed. At least not across the entire business landscape.
But on an individual company level:
👉Leader can and should take an interest in drilling down a level or two. Go beyond butts-in-seats and look at efficiency and interviewee experience.
👉Internal recruiting leaders should uncover and convey the importance of inefficiencies up the chain when they see them.
👉If you need to use an external firm, don’t just pick one who can find people. Choose one with the knowledge base to better improve your internal systems.
Partner at Hirewell. #3 Ranked Sarcastic Commenter on LinkedIn.
Plenty has been written about AI over the past two years. For much of that time, AI has been more hype than reality. I THINK 2026 is when that starts to change.
Here’s the first in a three part series of where we see AI going in the recruiting world.
———-
For the last few years, most companies treated AI like a recruiting assistant. It helped draft job descriptions, summarize resumes, and speed up outreach. Useful, sure. But it didn’t fundamentally change how hiring worked. And oftentimes, things needed to be double checked before hitting send.
I think that’s going to change.
In 2026, we’re seeing the rise of agentic HR. These are systems that don’t just support recruiters. They can execute work autonomously inside defined guardrails.
That shift is forcing talent leaders to rethink what recruiting teams are actually responsible for and what still requires a human.
Traditional recruiting AI waited for humans to click “next.”
Agentic systems don’t.
They can interpret real-time funnel data, align to hiring goals, and take multi-step action. That includes adjusting sourcing spend, coordinating interview schedules, and triggering workflow changes without manual oversight.
This isn’t automation layered onto old processes. It’s the early version of a self-driving recruiting function.
Time-to-fill and cost-per-hire still matter. They just don’t fully capture what’s changing.
A concept showing up more in 2026 is Return on Autonomy. It measures the value created when humans and autonomous systems are paired intentionally.
In plain terms, the question is simple.
Are we using technology to eliminate busywork, or are we just doing the same work faster?
Because speed doesn’t help if it leads to worse decisions, a weaker candidate experience, or more noise in the funnel.
As agentic systems absorb transactional work like screening, scheduling, and coordination, the role of recruiting leadership shifts.
The best TA leaders are spending less time managing process and more time doing what actually drives hiring outcomes. That includes aligning hiring to business priorities, building trust with candidates, and improving decision quality.
The real opportunity of 2026 isn’t more AI. It’s that recruiters finally get to focus on the work that requires being human.
Here’s the trap.
Companies adopt advanced recruiting technology but keep the same habits. Long approval chains. Inconsistent communication. Unclear evaluation criteria.
When that happens, speed increases, but trust collapses.
Candidates don’t experience innovation. They experience silence, confusion, and a process that feels even more impersonal than before.
In 2026, the human experience of hiring is becoming a differentiator again because so many companies are getting it wrong.
You don’t need a total rebuild tomorrow. But you do need clarity.
The companies winning in 2026 are asking the right questions.
What parts of our hiring process truly require human judgment?
Where are we slowing things down out of habit?
Are recruiters trained for strategic work, or just process management?
Do our systems increase transparency, or just efficiency?
These aren’t technology questions. They’re leadership questions.
Agentic HR is changing how recruiting works. It’s also creating a new challenge.
As employers deploy autonomous systems, candidates are doing the same. The result is an emerging AI-on-AI hiring arms race that’s flooding pipelines with highly optimized but low-trust applications.
Next in this series: The AI-on-AI Hiring Arms Race and How to Protect Hiring Quality Without Breaking Trust
A lot of companies are going to try to AI their way into faster hiring this year and still end up with worse results. If you want to build a recruiting model that actually works in 2026, one that balances speed, quality, and credibility, we can help. Reach out if you want a second set of eyes on your hiring approach.