Contact Us
Questions, comments, ideas for future content? Contact us below.
Relocation isn’t a repeatable hiring strategy. It’s catching lightning in a bottle.
Some companies confuse “going to the office 2 days a week isn’t so bad” with “looking to uproot my entire family to move someplace I never heard of.”
There’s two scenarios we’re seeing:
1. Current employees. Where companies hired remote. Then realized they wanted onsite after all.
Somewhere on the spectrum between “whoops” and “total bait and switch.”
The reasoning is usually “Amazon is doing it so why can’t we?”
Except you’re not Amazon. (Example #493 why you shouldn’t follow every FAANG trend.) And even Amazon is seeing it’s not that easy.
(Don’t worry. Amazon will be fine. They’ll find easy replacements for those who bail. Because they’re Amazon and you’re not.)
2. New hires. Usually in small markets where less talent exists.
Relocation was never easy. But pre-covid it was doable. It required either finding someone with a personal affinity to your location. Or someone looking for a lower cost of living.
The issues with both of these scenarios now:
👉No one wants to drive 5 minutes out of their way. Let alone uproot their entire life.
The permanent change of covid? Even with the return push, there’s exponentially more remote jobs now than before. That’s not changing.
People don’t want to relo because they don’t have to. Certainly not for the privilege of commuting.
👉No one wants to take a bath in the housing market.
62% of Americans have an interest rate under 4%, per Redfin. Rates are hovering at 8% as of this writing. You’re looking at a 60% increase in monthly expenses for the same value home. And that’s skipping over the whole housing shortage issue.
Yes, it still works with executive and high-skill niche hires. You know, because you’re ponying up for those types.
Which is what it would take for relo to work at any kind of scale. Paying top dollar.
Partner at Hirewell. #3 Ranked Sarcastic Commenter on LinkedIn.
If you’re hiring in 2026, you’re dealing with two realities at the same time.
First, traditional signals like degrees and pedigree are losing their value.
Second, Gen Z is reshaping expectations around speed, transparency, and trust.
Together, those forces are pushing talent acquisition into its next evolution.
As we outlined in Agentic HR Is Here: What Talent Acquisition Really Looks Like in 2026, recruiting is becoming more autonomous at the execution level. But autonomy alone doesn’t solve the core hiring problem.
You still need a better way to evaluate people.
That’s where skills-first hiring comes in.
For decades, degrees were used as a shortcut.
Not because they reliably predicted success, but because they reduced perceived risk and simplified decision-making.
That logic no longer holds.
Roles are changing too fast. Job titles mean less than they used to. And in a market where AI can generate a polished resume in seconds, pedigree is an even weaker signal.
Companies need capability, not credentials.
The bigger shift isn’t just skills-based hiring. It’s skills intelligence.
Instead of organizing work around static job descriptions, companies are starting to think in terms of capabilities. Work is assigned based on skill, not hierarchy or tenure.
This is the same evolution happening across workforce planning more broadly. Not headcount planning, but capability planning.
And it’s the only model that holds up in a fast-moving market.
Skills-first hiring is gaining traction because it solves multiple problems at once.
It improves quality of hire.
It increases internal mobility.
It reduces bias tied to pedigree.
And it aligns better with how work actually gets done.
But it’s also accelerating for a more practical reason.
The resume is no longer reliable.
As we covered in The AI-on-AI Hiring Arms Race, recruiting teams are now dealing with a flood of highly optimized, AI-generated applications. Many look great on paper and collapse under real scrutiny.
When that happens, skills-based evaluation stops being a “nice to have.” It becomes the only way to restore signal.
Now layer in Gen Z.
By 2026, Gen Z is one of the fastest-growing segments of the workforce. They are also the least tolerant of slow, opaque hiring processes.
One of the most important data points in the market right now is this:
A majority of Gen Z candidates will drop out if a hiring process exceeds 22 days.
Speed, to them, isn’t about impatience. It’s about competence.
If a company can’t run a clear, efficient hiring process, candidates assume it can’t run the business well either.
It’s a trust issue.
A large percentage of job seekers report that looking for work negatively impacts their mental health. The biggest driver isn’t rejection.
It’s silence.
Waiting to hear back. No closure. No clarity on next steps.
For Gen Z, that lack of transparency is a dealbreaker. It signals misalignment, not just poor communication.
In 2026, how you hire is inseparable from how you’re perceived as an employer.
For Gen Z, the hiring experience is part of the offer.
They expect:
If the process feels like a black box, they assume the culture is the same.
This is where skills-first hiring and agentic systems intersect. Technology can speed up execution, but only leadership can ensure the experience remains human.
The companies adapting fastest in 2026 are focused on a few fundamentals:
Skills-first hiring isn’t just about fairness. It’s about accuracy.
And Gen Z isn’t asking for special treatment. They’re forcing employers to modernize a hiring process that’s been broken for a long time.
The companies that adapt will hire better, faster, and with less churn. The companies that don’t will keep blaming the market while losing candidates to competitors who simply run a better process.
Most companies agree with skills-first hiring in theory. Very few have operationalized it in a way that actually improves outcomes. If you want help redesigning your hiring process for 2026, especially around skills-based evaluation and candidate experience, we can help. Reach out and we’ll walk you through what’s working right now.