Contact Us
Questions, comments, ideas for future content? Contact us below.
Unless you lived under a rock this year, you noticed:
1. Interest rates shot up.
2. Hiring fell off a cliff. (At least in Office Dork circles.)
Lots of hot takes mentioned “zero interest rate phenomenon” and “the end of free money.” But I want to dig into how this translated to the boatload of unemployed, A+ internal recruiters. (Or how some agency recruiters’ commission checks tanked.)
My layman’s explanation aka what I learned from too many educational YouTube binges. (Yes, I’m fun at parties.)
👉High interest rates are good for savers. Bad for borrowers.
Duh. If you have money, it’s good. If you don’t, it’s bad.
People with money can park it in “risk free” investments. Treasury bills, high yield savings accounts, etc. Collect 5% interest for the first time in forever.
People without money? They borrow at higher rates. A mortgage at 7-8% is a kick in the junk compared to 2-3% rates a couple years ago.
👉Rich people have to put their money somewhere.
High net wealth individuals and institutions (e.g. investment banks. Companies are people, too!) They don’t just put it in the places regular people do (stocks & their home.) They diversify to try to make money regardless of economic conditions.
Many of these investments have a high barrier to entry. Buying businesses, art, large real estate developments, etc. And for the purposes of this piece: venture capital & private equity.
👉You need a higher return when risk free rates aren’t zero.
Making an 8-10% yearly return in stocks is an easy call when risk free was 0%. But not when risk free is 5%.
The S&P 500 went nowhere over the last 2 years. (Down 18% in 2022, up 19% in 2023.) Wild swings. No gain. A 5% lock doesn’t look bad.
The same applies to venture capital. Investors know they’re taking moonshots. Most startups fail. A few strike it big. It’s an easy #yolo at 0%. But not at 5%. The rich will still invest in startups, but not as much.
👉Less VC investments mean less hiring. (And “easier” hiring.)
Another duh. Raising money means hiring to grow.
You’re probably saying “hey James, my firm isn’t a startup. We’re not spending on recruiting either. What’s up with that?”
Labor has its own supply & demand curve. The supply of workers is fairly fixed. But hiring demand can swing dramatically. When there’s a lot of tech hiring and limited tech workers, it creates scarcity of labor.
In that scenario, every firm (not just start ups) needs to spend more money to recruit. The whole “war for talent” everyone was buzzing about.
When hiring demand dips? Companies may hire less AND have an easier time doing it. With less recruiters.
Because of less competition.
👉Business loans are more expensive too.
This isn’t just about VC money. As debt is more expensive, people have a harder time affording loans to start a business or finance growth. Like taking on a new mortgage.
Less business financing. Less hiring. Less recruiters.
Partner at Hirewell. #3 Ranked Sarcastic Commenter on LinkedIn.
If you’re hiring in 2026, you’re dealing with two realities at the same time.
First, traditional signals like degrees and pedigree are losing their value.
Second, Gen Z is reshaping expectations around speed, transparency, and trust.
Together, those forces are pushing talent acquisition into its next evolution.
As we outlined in Agentic HR Is Here: What Talent Acquisition Really Looks Like in 2026, recruiting is becoming more autonomous at the execution level. But autonomy alone doesn’t solve the core hiring problem.
You still need a better way to evaluate people.
That’s where skills-first hiring comes in.
For decades, degrees were used as a shortcut.
Not because they reliably predicted success, but because they reduced perceived risk and simplified decision-making.
That logic no longer holds.
Roles are changing too fast. Job titles mean less than they used to. And in a market where AI can generate a polished resume in seconds, pedigree is an even weaker signal.
Companies need capability, not credentials.
The bigger shift isn’t just skills-based hiring. It’s skills intelligence.
Instead of organizing work around static job descriptions, companies are starting to think in terms of capabilities. Work is assigned based on skill, not hierarchy or tenure.
This is the same evolution happening across workforce planning more broadly. Not headcount planning, but capability planning.
And it’s the only model that holds up in a fast-moving market.
Skills-first hiring is gaining traction because it solves multiple problems at once.
It improves quality of hire.
It increases internal mobility.
It reduces bias tied to pedigree.
And it aligns better with how work actually gets done.
But it’s also accelerating for a more practical reason.
The resume is no longer reliable.
As we covered in The AI-on-AI Hiring Arms Race, recruiting teams are now dealing with a flood of highly optimized, AI-generated applications. Many look great on paper and collapse under real scrutiny.
When that happens, skills-based evaluation stops being a “nice to have.” It becomes the only way to restore signal.
Now layer in Gen Z.
By 2026, Gen Z is one of the fastest-growing segments of the workforce. They are also the least tolerant of slow, opaque hiring processes.
One of the most important data points in the market right now is this:
A majority of Gen Z candidates will drop out if a hiring process exceeds 22 days.
Speed, to them, isn’t about impatience. It’s about competence.
If a company can’t run a clear, efficient hiring process, candidates assume it can’t run the business well either.
It’s a trust issue.
A large percentage of job seekers report that looking for work negatively impacts their mental health. The biggest driver isn’t rejection.
It’s silence.
Waiting to hear back. No closure. No clarity on next steps.
For Gen Z, that lack of transparency is a dealbreaker. It signals misalignment, not just poor communication.
In 2026, how you hire is inseparable from how you’re perceived as an employer.
For Gen Z, the hiring experience is part of the offer.
They expect:
If the process feels like a black box, they assume the culture is the same.
This is where skills-first hiring and agentic systems intersect. Technology can speed up execution, but only leadership can ensure the experience remains human.
The companies adapting fastest in 2026 are focused on a few fundamentals:
Skills-first hiring isn’t just about fairness. It’s about accuracy.
And Gen Z isn’t asking for special treatment. They’re forcing employers to modernize a hiring process that’s been broken for a long time.
The companies that adapt will hire better, faster, and with less churn. The companies that don’t will keep blaming the market while losing candidates to competitors who simply run a better process.
Most companies agree with skills-first hiring in theory. Very few have operationalized it in a way that actually improves outcomes. If you want help redesigning your hiring process for 2026, especially around skills-based evaluation and candidate experience, we can help. Reach out and we’ll walk you through what’s working right now.