Contact Us
Questions, comments, ideas for future content? Contact us below.
What does it look like to leap from media planning into executive HR leadership, and build one of the most agile recruiting teams at a global agency along the way?
In Episode 13 of Beyond the Offer, co-hosts Rosanna Snediker and Bill Gates sit down with Amy Onori, SVP of Talent Acquisition at Publicis Media, to explore her bold career pivots, lessons in leadership, and the operational mindset that fuels her success. From her early days in media buying to launching innovative hiring models, Amyโs story is packed with insight for recruiters, HR leaders, and anyone navigating change.
Amyโs career started in media planning, right as the 2008 recession hit. While she found herself drawn to the agency environment, the role itself didnโt spark her passion. Taking a leap of faith, she left a full-time job to accept a freelance recruiting coordinator position, unsure of what would come next.
โCareer pivots arenโt setbacksโtheyโre often the first step toward something better.โ
That single decision reshaped her entire path, leading her into talent acquisition, where she discovered the perfect intersection of people, process, and purpose.
One of the episodeโs standout insights is Amyโs people-first approach to building agile and accountable recruiting teams. At Publicis, she implemented a business partner model, where recruiters own hiring across all levels for a specific business unit, creating trust and consistency across the org.
โWeโre not just recruitersโweโre strategic partners. We need to be the ones advising the business, not reacting to it.โ
Her team structure is rooted in clarity and empowerment:
Amyโs leadership philosophy centers around three pillars:
Operational Prowess. Results-Driven Focus. Future-First Thinking.
โRecruiters should be the most organized people in the room. Weโre the ones informing the business of whatโs happening with talentโnot the other way around.โ
From launching live hiring days to optimizing internal systems, Amy leads with innovation, ensuring her team stays scalable, strategic, and prepared for whatever comes next.
With experience across both boutique firms and global brands, Amy offers a unique take on agency versus in-house work. While the pace and processes change, the human side of recruiting remains constant: relationship-building, trust, and adaptability.
Her team at Publicis embraces that ethos, especially during hiring slowdowns, using those moments to refine strategy, reengage with candidates, and โhustle smarterโ without burnout.
Listen to the full episode of Beyond the Offer for Amy Onoriโs full journey. Plus actionable insights on career growth, team building, and modern recruitment strategy.
๐ฉ Subscribe to Talent Insights for more episodes and updates on the future of hiring.
Plenty has been written about AI over the past two years. For much of that time, AI has been more hype than reality. I THINK 2026 is when that starts to change.
Hereโs the first in a three part series of where we see AI going in the recruiting world.
โโโ-
For the last few years, most companies treated AI like a recruiting assistant. It helped draft job descriptions, summarize resumes, and speed up outreach. Useful, sure. But it didnโt fundamentally change how hiring worked. And oftentimes, things needed to be double checked before hitting send.
I think thatโs going to change.
In 2026, weโre seeing the rise of agentic HR. These are systems that donโt just support recruiters. They can execute work autonomously inside defined guardrails.
That shift is forcing talent leaders to rethink what recruiting teams are actually responsible for and what still requires a human.
Traditional recruiting AI waited for humans to click โnext.โ
Agentic systems donโt.
They can interpret real-time funnel data, align to hiring goals, and take multi-step action. That includes adjusting sourcing spend, coordinating interview schedules, and triggering workflow changes without manual oversight.
This isnโt automation layered onto old processes. Itโs the early version of a self-driving recruiting function.
Time-to-fill and cost-per-hire still matter. They just donโt fully capture whatโs changing.
A concept showing up more in 2026 is Return on Autonomy. It measures the value created when humans and autonomous systems are paired intentionally.
In plain terms, the question is simple.
Are we using technology to eliminate busywork, or are we just doing the same work faster?
Because speed doesnโt help if it leads to worse decisions, a weaker candidate experience, or more noise in the funnel.
As agentic systems absorb transactional work like screening, scheduling, and coordination, the role of recruiting leadership shifts.
The best TA leaders are spending less time managing process and more time doing what actually drives hiring outcomes. That includes aligning hiring to business priorities, building trust with candidates, and improving decision quality.
The real opportunity of 2026 isnโt more AI. Itโs that recruiters finally get to focus on the work that requires being human.
Hereโs the trap.
Companies adopt advanced recruiting technology but keep the same habits. Long approval chains. Inconsistent communication. Unclear evaluation criteria.
When that happens, speed increases, but trust collapses.
Candidates donโt experience innovation. They experience silence, confusion, and a process that feels even more impersonal than before.
In 2026, the human experience of hiring is becoming a differentiator again because so many companies are getting it wrong.
You donโt need a total rebuild tomorrow. But you do need clarity.
The companies winning in 2026 are asking the right questions.
What parts of our hiring process truly require human judgment?
Where are we slowing things down out of habit?
Are recruiters trained for strategic work, or just process management?
Do our systems increase transparency, or just efficiency?
These arenโt technology questions. Theyโre leadership questions.
Agentic HR is changing how recruiting works. Itโs also creating a new challenge.
As employers deploy autonomous systems, candidates are doing the same. The result is an emerging AI-on-AI hiring arms race thatโs flooding pipelines with highly optimized but low-trust applications.
Next in this series: The AI-on-AI Hiring Arms Race and How to Protect Hiring Quality Without Breaking Trust
A lot of companies are going to try to AI their way into faster hiring this year and still end up with worse results. If you want to build a recruiting model that actually works in 2026, one that balances speed, quality, and credibility, we can help. Reach out if you want a second set of eyes on your hiring approach.